Difference between revisions of "User talk:DnaGonite"
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (→Mobility template: Added some more discrepancies + separated the trees) |
Colok76286 (talk | contribs) (→German tree (in progress): Added some more discrepancies) |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Flakpanzer I]] || 100 HP || 109 HP || || | | [[Flakpanzer I]] || 100 HP || 109 HP || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[Panzerjager I]] || 175 HP || 191 HP || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[Flakpanzer 38]] || 262 HP || 286 HP || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[Sd.Kfz.234/3]] || 367 HP || 401 HP || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[15cm sIG 33 B Sfl]] || 271 HP || 296 HP || || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[Pz.III J]] || || || 21.8t || 21.3t | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[StuG III A]] || 525 HP || 572 HP || || | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 16:22, 18 February 2020
User talk:DnaGonite/Archive/2019 |
Contents
Mobility template
Hello, I've been using the Mobility Template Template:TankMobility lately but I've noticed a lot of discrepancies between in-game values and the wiki.
US tree (finished)
Vehicle | AB Engine upgraded | Weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
In-game | Wiki | In-game | Wiki | |
M13 MGMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
M3 GMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
M16 MGMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
M8 Greyhound | 159 HP | 210 HP | ||
M10 GMC | 717 HP | 782 HP | ||
LVT(A)(4) ZIS-2 (USA) | 437 HP | 477 HP | ||
M6A1 | 1272 HP | 1526 HP | ||
M15A1 CGMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
M18 GMC | 804 HP | 878 HP | ||
M4A3E2 | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
M18 "Black Cat" | 804 HP | 878 HP | ||
Cobra King | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
M4A3E2 (76) W | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
M19 | 518 HP | 565 HP | ||
M36 GMC | 874 HP | 954 HP | ||
M56 | 350 HP | 382 HP | ||
T26E1-1 | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
Super Hellcat | 804 HP | 878 HP | ||
T34 | 1287 HP | 1545 HP | 65.8t | 65.1t |
T29 | 1224 HP | 1469 HP | ||
T30 | 1287 HP | 1545 HP | 65.8t | 65.1t |
T32 | 1228 HP | 1469 HP | ||
T32E1 | 1228 HP | 1469 HP | ||
M42 | 874 HP | 954 HP | ||
T95 | 874 HP | 954 HP | ||
T114 | 280 HP | 305 HP | ||
M103 | 1287 HP | 1545 HP | ||
M163 | 11.0t | 11.2t | ||
M247 | ??? HP | 1431 HP | ||
XM-803 | 2356 HP | 2385 HP | ||
M1 Abrams | 2533 HP | 2898 HP | ||
IPM1 | 2533 HP | 2898 HP | ||
M1A1 Abrams | 2533 HP | 2898 HP | ||
ADATS | 23.7t | 25.0t | ||
M1A2 Abrams | 2533 HP | 2898 HP |
XM-1 (Chrysler) couldn't be checked in-game as it wasn't displayed at the time.
German tree (in progress)
Vehicle | AB Engine upgraded | Weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
In-game | Wiki | In-game | Wiki | |
Pz.III B | 334 HP | 477 HP | ||
Flakpanzer I | 100 HP | 109 HP | ||
Panzerjager I | 175 HP | 191 HP | ||
Flakpanzer 38 | 262 HP | 286 HP | ||
Sd.Kfz.234/3 | 367 HP | 401 HP | ||
15cm sIG 33 B Sfl | 271 HP | 296 HP | ||
Pz.III J | 21.8t | 21.3t | ||
StuG III A | 525 HP | 572 HP |
Italian tree (in progress)
Vehicle | AB Engine upgraded | Weight | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
In-game | Wiki | In-game | Wiki | |
Breda 501 | 248 HP | 271 HP | ||
R3 T20 FA-HS | 166 HP | 181 HP | ||
105/25 M43 | 324 HP | 353 HP | ||
75/34 M43 | 324 HP | 353 HP | ||
75/46 M43 | 324 HP | 353 HP | ||
AUBL/74 | 8.2t | 8.5t | ||
R3 T106 FA | 3.4t | 3.5t | ||
Centauro | 25.0t | 27.0t | ||
Centauro ROMOR | 28.0t | 30.0t | ||
Ariete (P) | 53.0t | 53.8t |
M43 "G.C.Leoncello" couldn't be checked in-game as it wasn't displayed at the time.
Is there a way to correct that? --Colok76286 (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. The R3 T106 FA discrepancy is due to a difference in rounding strategies between the wiki and the game. Any values that are automatically inserted and seem to be off by +- 1 on the last digit are likely just rounding errors, and I'm not sure how much can be done to remedy them. As for the other values, I will see if we can get the database maintainer to check/correct the values. Could you check your values for M4 Tipo IC, as they don't seem to agree with either the game or the wiki. -DnaGonite (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, it was the Breda 501 and not the M4 tipo Ic. --Colok76286 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I added the next discrepancies I found to the list. HP values are for Arcade Spaded. --Colok76286 (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is the guy in charge of the numbers User:VolgaIgor--blastedryan (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with continuing updating the list here, however (unless DnaGonite is getting annoyed by the new talk notifications). The list has already been forwarded for investigation.--Inceptor57 (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- I updated the whole US tree but I do not have vehicles at BR 6.7 and above upgraded so I still reported the discrepancies I noticed at those tiers but I can't confirm them. --Colok76286 (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your hard work! But how do you know they are discrepancies if you don't have them spaded? -DnaGonite (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Based on the numbers that were in the wiki already, the fact that many tanks use the same engine (M60 family, M1 family, etc.) and the fact that the difference between HP Stock and Upgraded is a multiplier of around 1.23. But feel free to recheck the end of the list or have it rechecked by someone owning the tanks. I have everything spaded until BR 6.3 included (and also the T30). --Colok76286 (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your hard work! But how do you know they are discrepancies if you don't have them spaded? -DnaGonite (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- I updated the whole US tree but I do not have vehicles at BR 6.7 and above upgraded so I still reported the discrepancies I noticed at those tiers but I can't confirm them. --Colok76286 (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- I added the next discrepancies I found to the list. HP values are for Arcade Spaded. --Colok76286 (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, it was the Breda 501 and not the M4 tipo Ic. --Colok76286 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Few days back I added Penetration statistics and Shell details to 3 inch Mk.33 (76 mm). I want to ask If that is right way or I should add it directly to correct armament section on vehicle page that is using it? Same like tanks. Thanks -Vianočka (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see any harm in adding to both pages. The weapon pages are designed to be a more detailed overview of the weapon, but it's still useful information to be able to see when looking at a specific vehicle. The only problem I could see is if the ship has large amounts of different secondary/anti-air armaments, in which case the tables may overly bloat the page, but that shouldn't apply to the large majority of vehicles. -DnaGonite (talk) 10:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)