User talk:U38088265
|
User talk:U38088265/Archive/2019 |
Mobility template
Hello, I've been using the Mobility Template Template:TankMobility lately but I've noticed a lot of discrepancies between in-game values and the wiki. Examples:
| Vehicle | AB Engine HP | Weight | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-game | Wiki | In-game | Wiki | |
| Breda 501 | 248 HP | 271 HP | ||
| R3 T20 FA-HS | 166 HP | 181 HP | ||
| 105/25 M43 | 324 HP | 353 HP | ||
| 75/34 M43 | 324 HP | 353 HP | ||
| 75/46 M43 | 324 HP | 353 HP | ||
| AUBL74 | 8.2t | 8.5t | ||
| R3 T106 FA | 3.4t | 3.5t | ||
| Centauro | 25.0t | 27.0t | ||
| Centauro ROMOR | 28.0t | 30.0t | ||
| Ariete (P) | 53.0t | 53.8t | ||
| M13 MGMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
| M3 GMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
| M16 MGMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
| M8 Greyhound | 159 HP | 210 HP | ||
| M10 GMC | 717 HP | 782 HP | ||
| LVT(A)(4) ZiS-2 (USA) | 437 HP | 477 HP | ||
| M6A1 | 1272 HP | 1526 HP | ||
| M15A1 MGMC | 259 HP | 282 HP | ||
| M18 GMC | 804 HP | 878 HP | ||
| M4A3E2 | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
| M18 Black Cat | 804 HP | 878 HP | ||
| Cobra King | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
| M4A3E2 (76) W | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
| M19 | 518 HP | 565 HP | ||
| M36 GMC | 874 HP | 954 HP | ||
| M56 | 350 HP | 382 HP | ||
| T26E1-1 | 795 HP | 954 HP | ||
| Super Hellcat | 804 HP | 878 HP | ||
| T34 | 1287 HP | 1545 HP | 65.8t | 65.1t |
| T29 | 1224 HP | 1469 HP | ||
| T30 | 1287 HP | 1545 HP | 65.8t | 65.1t |
| T32 | 1228 HP | 1469 HP | ||
| T32E1 | 1228 HP | 1469 HP | ||
| M42 | 874 HP | 954 HP | ||
| T95 | 874 HP | 954 HP | ||
| T114 | 280 HP | 305 HP | ||
| M103 | 1287 HP | 1545 HP | ||
Is there a way to correct that? --U44629479 (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. The R3 T106 FA discrepancy is due to a difference in rounding strategies between the wiki and the game. Any values that are automatically inserted and seem to be off by +- 1 on the last digit are likely just rounding errors, and I'm not sure how much can be done to remedy them. As for the other values, I will see if we can get the database maintainer to check/correct the values. Could you check your values for M4 Tipo IC, as they don't seem to agree with either the game or the wiki. -U38088265 (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, it was the Breda 501 and not the M4 tipo Ic. --U44629479 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I added the next discrepancies I found to the list. HP values are for Arcade Spaded. --U44629479 (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- This is the guy in charge of the numbers User:U36063762--U30585107 (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with continuing updating the list here, however (unless DnaGonite is getting annoyed by the new talk notifications). The list has already been forwarded for investigation.--U28580205 (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- I added the next discrepancies I found to the list. HP values are for Arcade Spaded. --U44629479 (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- My bad, it was the Breda 501 and not the M4 tipo Ic. --U44629479 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Few days back I added Penetration statistics and Shell details to 3 inch Mk.33 (76 mm). I want to ask If that is right way or I should add it directly to correct armament section on vehicle page that is using it? Same like tanks. Thanks -U6133915 (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see any harm in adding to both pages. The weapon pages are designed to be a more detailed overview of the weapon, but it's still useful information to be able to see when looking at a specific vehicle. The only problem I could see is if the ship has large amounts of different secondary/anti-air armaments, in which case the tables may overly bloat the page, but that shouldn't apply to the large majority of vehicles. -U38088265 (talk) 10:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
