Difference between revisions of "Talk:S.81"
DestroyDaDa (talk | contribs) (→Defensive armament comparison: new section) |
Inceptor57 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The article states as a con that this aircraft has "abysmal defensive firepower", why is that so? Out of rank I bombers, only the Sunderland, H6K, TB-3 and N.C.233 (at a BR of 2.3) have better defensive armament. I would say the S.81 has adequate defensive firepower and not list it as a con. | The article states as a con that this aircraft has "abysmal defensive firepower", why is that so? Out of rank I bombers, only the Sunderland, H6K, TB-3 and N.C.233 (at a BR of 2.3) have better defensive armament. I would say the S.81 has adequate defensive firepower and not list it as a con. | ||
| + | : If you disagree with the statement, you are free to edit it to what you believe reflects the aircraft's abilities better. --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 15:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 16 April 2019
Defensive armament comparison
The article states as a con that this aircraft has "abysmal defensive firepower", why is that so? Out of rank I bombers, only the Sunderland, H6K, TB-3 and N.C.233 (at a BR of 2.3) have better defensive armament. I would say the S.81 has adequate defensive firepower and not list it as a con.
- If you disagree with the statement, you are free to edit it to what you believe reflects the aircraft's abilities better. --Inceptor57 (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
