Difference between revisions of "320 mm/44 OTO model 1934 (320 mm)"
(Created page) |
Jareel_Skaj (talk | contribs) (Added →Available ammunition) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== Available ammunition === | === Available ammunition === | ||
| − | ''Describe the shells that are available for the weapon and their features and purpose. If it concerns autocannons or machine guns, write about different ammo belts and what is inside (which types of shells).'' | + | <!-- ''Describe the shells that are available for the weapon and their features and purpose. If it concerns autocannons or machine guns, write about different ammo belts and what is inside (which types of shells).'' --> |
| + | Gun features only two types of shells: | ||
| + | * 320 mm Granata Perforante - Semi-Armor Piercing (SAP) - When possible they are the preferred choice, as they have 360% more explosive filler than the armor-piercing shells, thus they should be the first choice for a vast majority of the heavy cruisers and everything smaller. | ||
| + | * 320 mm APHEBC Palla - Armor-Piercing Capped Ballistic Capped (APCBC) - Dedicated shell against heavy armor with both: armour-piercing cap and ballistic cap, which effectively translates to a better penetration at a higher angles of attack and longer ranges. It's best used against battleships and battlecruisers - while the post-penetration effect is miserable, it still can surprise even much more capable enemies. It's best used to destroy enemy [[ammo racks]], where the amount of explosive filler isn't important if the magazines are hit directly. | ||
| + | {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Ammunition|320 mm Granata Perforante, 320 mm APHEBC Palla}} | ||
=== Comparison with analogues === | === Comparison with analogues === | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 2 November 2023
Contents
Description
Write an introduction to the article in 2-3 small paragraphs. Briefly tell us about the history of the development and combat using the weaponry and also about its features. Compile a list of air, ground, or naval vehicles that feature this weapon system in the game.
Vehicles equipped with this weapon
General info
Tell us about the tactical and technical characteristics of the cannon or machine gun.
Available ammunition
Gun features only two types of shells:
- 320 mm Granata Perforante - Semi-Armor Piercing (SAP) - When possible they are the preferred choice, as they have 360% more explosive filler than the armor-piercing shells, thus they should be the first choice for a vast majority of the heavy cruisers and everything smaller.
- 320 mm APHEBC Palla - Armor-Piercing Capped Ballistic Capped (APCBC) - Dedicated shell against heavy armor with both: armour-piercing cap and ballistic cap, which effectively translates to a better penetration at a higher angles of attack and longer ranges. It's best used against battleships and battlecruisers - while the post-penetration effect is miserable, it still can surprise even much more capable enemies. It's best used to destroy enemy ammo racks, where the amount of explosive filler isn't important if the magazines are hit directly.
| Penetration statistics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Penetration @ 0° Angle of Attack (mm) | |||||
| 1,000 m | 2,500 m | 5,000 m | 7,500 m | 10,000 m | 15,000 m | ||
| Granata Perforante | SAP | 427 | 386 | 327 | 279 | 241 | 189 |
| APHEBC Palla | APCBC | 678 | 619 | 533 | 462 | 403 | 322 |
| Shell details | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammunition | Type of warhead |
Velocity (m/s) |
Projectile mass (kg) |
Fuse delay (s) |
Fuse sensitivity (mm) |
Explosive mass (TNT equivalent) (kg) |
Ricochet | |||||
| 0% | 50% | 100% | ||||||||||
| Granata Perforante | SAP | 830 | 475 | 0.03 | 17 | 23.4 | 47° | 60° | 65° | |||
| APHEBC Palla | APCBC | 830 | 525 | 0.03 | 17 | 6.38 | 48° | 63° | 71° | |||
Comparison with analogues
Give a comparative description of cannons/machine guns that have firepower equal to this weapon.
Usage in battles
Describe the cannon/machine gun in the game - its distinctive features, tactics of usage against notable opponents. Please don't write a "guide" - do not impose a single point of view, but give the reader food for thought.
Pros and cons
Summarise and briefly evaluate the weaponry in terms of its characteristics and combat effectiveness. Mark pros and cons as a list.
Pros:
Cons:
History
Examine the history of the creation and combat usage of the weapon in more detail than in the introduction. If the historical reference turns out to be too long, take it to a separate article, taking a link to the article about the weapon and adding a block "/History" (example: https://wiki.warthunder.com/(Weapon-name)/History) and add a link to it here using the main template. Be sure to reference text and sources by using <ref></ref>, as well as adding them at the end of the article with <references />.
Media
Excellent additions to the article would be video guides, screenshots from the game, and photos.
See also
Links to the articles on the War Thunder Wiki that you think will be useful for the reader, for example:
- reference to the article about the variant of the cannon/machine gun;
- references to approximate analogues by other nations and research trees.
External links
Paste links to sources and external resources, such as:
- topic on the official game forum;
- other literature.
