User talk:U84459403 - Revision history

U44629479: Edits

2021-10-27T14:18:16Z

Edits

U84459403 at 21:52, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T21:52:12Z

U84459403 at 21:51, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T21:51:42Z

U84459403 at 21:49, 26 October 2021

2021-10-26T21:49:54Z

U84459403: /* WZ-551 */

2021-10-26T21:49:41Z

‎WZ-551

U44629479: Edits

2021-10-26T16:49:48Z

Edits

New page

==WZ-551==
There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==WZ-551==
 There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
+:Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ? It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited. --[[User:U84459403|U84459403]] ([[User talk:U84459403|talk]]) 21:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
-Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?
+::The VAB is cited to explain it has no paternity over the WZ-551. Look at 3D models of both vehicle fronts and you'll see that they differ greatly. All wheeled APCs from that period look the same: BTR-80, Patria Pasi, M93 Fox. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 14:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 26 October 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?		Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?
−	It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited.	+	It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited.--[[User:U84459403\|U84459403]] ([[User talk:U84459403\|talk]]) 21:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 26 October 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?		Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?
−	It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB.	+	It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB as in all sources you gave the VAB is cited.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==WZ-551==
 There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?
 It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 26 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==WZ-551==		==WZ-551==
	There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551\|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479\|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)		There is no evidence of link between the WZ-551 and the VAB other than the external form. See [[wikipedia:WZ-551\|[Wikipedia] WZ-551]], [http://www.military-today.com/apc/wz_551.htm <nowiki>[Military Today]</nowiki> Type 92] and [https://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/China/WZ551-Type92_APC.php <nowiki>[Tanks Encyclopedia]</nowiki> Type 90 & 92 APC]. --[[User:U44629479\|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479\|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
		+	Yes but you can't deny there is at least an inspiration of design to say the least or are we saying that China never followed other design for their own vehicles ?
		+	It's quite disrespectful and dishonest if you don't allow at least to make an hint the WZ551 chassis was inspired by the VAB.