User talk:U5724584 - Revision history

U5724584 at 21:12, 31 March 2021

2021-03-31T21:12:59Z

U38088265: /* Current */ Response

2020-09-14T09:38:38Z

‎Current: Response

U5724584 at 04:41, 14 September 2020

2020-09-14T04:41:57Z

U5724584 at 05:36, 8 June 2020

2020-06-08T05:36:57Z

U30853183: Response

2019-08-26T02:08:46Z

Response

U5724584: /* Current */ Response.

2019-08-25T15:00:58Z

‎Current: Response.

U30853183: /* Current */

2019-08-24T05:03:36Z

‎Current

U5724584 at 01:21, 9 March 2019

2019-03-09T01:21:57Z

U5724584 at 05:03, 4 February 2019

2019-02-04T05:03:04Z

U5724584: /* Naval Sort Discussion */

2019-02-01T15:52:01Z

‎Naval Sort Discussion

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Current=
 What is the correct wording for this?
@@ Line 34: / Line 55: @@
 Is there one consistent word that should be used across the entire Wiki for this? If so, I would be happy to start modifying pages that have these to be more consistent across the Wiki. [[User:U5724584|U5724584]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 04:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 : '''"uses"''' should be used when linking to pages that have similar titles but aren't related (ie disambiguation pages). '''"versions"''' and '''"variants"''' are reasonably interchangeable, but I would suggest using '''"variants"''' for vehicles that are related but different (eg family pages), while '''"versions"''' should be kept solely for vehicles that are the exact same but in different trees. You could also consider elaborating further on how they are related, for example "For other vehicles of the family, see [[]]". - [[User:U38088265|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265|talk]]) 09:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 14 September 2020
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Is there one consistent word that should be used across the entire Wiki for this? If so, I would be happy to start modifying pages that have these to be more consistent across the Wiki. [[User:U5724584\|U5724584]] ([[User talk:U5724584\|talk]]) 04:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)		Is there one consistent word that should be used across the entire Wiki for this? If so, I would be happy to start modifying pages that have these to be more consistent across the Wiki. [[User:U5724584\|U5724584]] ([[User talk:U5724584\|talk]]) 04:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
		+	: '''"uses"''' should be used when linking to pages that have similar titles but aren't related (ie disambiguation pages). '''"versions"''' and '''"variants"''' are reasonably interchangeable, but I would suggest using '''"variants"''' for vehicles that are related but different (eg family pages), while '''"versions"''' should be kept solely for vehicles that are the exact same but in different trees. You could also consider elaborating further on how they are related, for example "For other vehicles of the family, see [[]]". - [[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 09:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

	=Archived=		=Archived=

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:41, 14 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Current=		=Current=
		+	What is the correct wording for this?
		+
		+	{{About
		+	\|about = Country's vehicle
		+	\|usage = '''other ________'''
		+	\|link =
		+	}}
		+
		+	Because some pages use,
		+
		+	{{About
		+	\|about = Country's vehicle
		+	\|usage = other '''uses'''
		+	\|link =
		+	}}
		+
		+	or,
		+
		+	{{About
		+	\|about = Country's vehicle
		+	\|usage = other '''versions'''
		+	\|link =
		+	}}
		+
		+	or
		+
		+	{{About
		+	\|about = Country's vehicle
		+	\|usage = other '''variants'''
		+	\|link =
		+	}}
		+
		+	Is there one consistent word that should be used across the entire Wiki for this? If so, I would be happy to start modifying pages that have these to be more consistent across the Wiki. [[User:U5724584\|U5724584]] ([[User talk:U5724584\|talk]]) 04:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

	=Archived=		=Archived=

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Current=
 =Archived=
-==Naval Sort Discussion==
+==17.01.2019==
 In regard to the naval sort template, Inceptor57 came up with one, and we discussed with each other if its the way it should be. It's only a prototype. As of now, it is still under deliberation. here is the link to said prototype template http://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Template:USA_fleet_sort --[[User:U30853183|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 04:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 :Yeah, that's looking pretty good. I'm not really sure how much better that could be done. Here's hoping it gets approved and rolled out soon. [[User:U5724584|MiniMe943]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 19:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
@@ Line 17: / Line 13: @@
 :::: I just want to say that a sorting table for navies per nation has already been made. I think. Im pretty sure. Trust me, there has been a lot of work on the wiki these past few months despite seeming like nothing is changing. It's almost done. If you want a hint about what it may look like, take a look at the Russian Wiki: https://wiki.warthunder.ru/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 [[User:Kmsxkuse|Kmsxkuse]] ([[User talk:Kmsxkuse|talk]]) 03:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 :::::That's the first time I've seen the RU Wiki, and holy cow... some aspects of that site are really slick. I'd love to see some of those design cues transferred over. [[User:U5724584|MiniMe943]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 19:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Regards--[[User:U30853183|U30853183]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 05:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 :Coastal defense ships are a very interesting proposition for War Thunder that I hadn't considered. They're kind of weird, and I don't know how they would fit into the existing naval trees. Sweden seemed to be the only real nation to even use these kinds of ships by WWII (if you exclude a couple German captured ones), so other nations would likely get much older versions of these ships. If it was balanced, I don't see any real issues with it being added, but Gaijin hasn't set any real precedents with these type of craft, so we'll just have to wait and see. I think if it were added, it would likely just receive the unique classification of "coastal defense ship", similarly to the "naval ferry barges" or "anti-air ferrys". [[User:U5724584|U5724584]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 15:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 =Archived=

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 24 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Current=		=Current=
		+	Hey, question. I was looking through your list of vehicles you want added, and in particular the Swedish warships. Have you ever heard of the HSwMS Gustaf V? If so, would you consider her a Battleship or an Armored Cruiser? She was a coastal defense ship, so sort of in-between both.
		+	Regards--[[User:U30853183\|U30853183]] ([[User talk:U30853183\|talk]]) 05:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

	=Archived=		=Archived=

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 9 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	=Current=
		+
	=Archived=		=Archived=
	==Naval Sort Discussion==		==Naval Sort Discussion==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Archived=
 ==Naval Sort Discussion==
-In regard to the naval sort template, Inceptor57 came up with one, and we discussed with each other if its the way it should be. It's only a prototype. As of now, it is still under deliberation. here is the link to said prototype template http://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Template:USA_fleet_sort --[[User:&#42;JonCS29|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:&#42;JonCS29|talk]]) 04:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
+In regard to the naval sort template, Inceptor57 came up with one, and we discussed with each other if its the way it should be. It's only a prototype. As of now, it is still under deliberation. here is the link to said prototype template http://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Template:USA_fleet_sort --[[User:U30853183|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 04:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 :Yeah, that's looking pretty good. I'm not really sure how much better that could be done. Here's hoping it gets approved and rolled out soon. [[User:U5724584|MiniMe943]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 19:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
-::I also had the suggestion of doing it the usual way, but using the in-game vehicle type icons (the symbol next to the BR) as the different types--[[User:&#42;JonCS29|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:&#42;JonCS29|talk]]) 05:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
+::I also had the suggestion of doing it the usual way, but using the in-game vehicle type icons (the symbol next to the BR) as the different types--[[User:U30853183|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 05:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 :::That's an interesting idea, but it would make it inconsistent with the other templates, no? I think if you're going to do that, you'd have to do that for all the other templates too (i.e. Adding the symbols for Light Tank, Medium Tank, etc. to [https://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Template:USSR_ground_sort Ground Sorts]). But then it also wouldn't really work as easily for some templates, like the [https://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Template:USA_air_sort USA air sort], so... I'm not really sure how you'd go about all that.
 :::Upon multiple readings, I might also just be missing your exact meaning, so I could just be wrong about this. [[User:U5724584|MiniMe943]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 06:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
-:::: That was a typo on my part. I meant INSTEAD of the usual way. They (the navy icon things) would be used in lieu of the normal class types of the other sort trees. As current, there would be about 5 different classes based on the icons: Motor Gun/Torpedo Boats [Turquoise hollow triangle], Gunboats/Sub Chasers/Minesweepers [Light Blue Triangle], Ferries/Barges [Light Orange Hollow Rectangle], Destroyers [Orange hollow Bullet Shape], and Crusiers [Light Red hollow Bullet shape with line at bottom]. I forget the technical term for the bullet shape. --[[User:&#42;JonCS29|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:&#42;JonCS29|talk]]) 02:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
+:::: That was a typo on my part. I meant INSTEAD of the usual way. They (the navy icon things) would be used in lieu of the normal class types of the other sort trees. As current, there would be about 5 different classes based on the icons: Motor Gun/Torpedo Boats [Turquoise hollow triangle], Gunboats/Sub Chasers/Minesweepers [Light Blue Triangle], Ferries/Barges [Light Orange Hollow Rectangle], Destroyers [Orange hollow Bullet Shape], and Crusiers [Light Red hollow Bullet shape with line at bottom]. I forget the technical term for the bullet shape. --[[User:U30853183|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 02:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
-:::: Do you use the forums, by the way? --[[User:&#42;JonCS29|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:&#42;JonCS29|talk]]) 02:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
+:::: Do you use the forums, by the way? --[[User:U30853183|&#42;JonCS29]] ([[User talk:U30853183|talk]]) 02:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 ::::: I have ''used'' the forums, but I wouldn't say I ''use'' the forums. [[User:U5724584|MiniMe943]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 19:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 :::: I just want to say that a sorting table for navies per nation has already been made. I think. Im pretty sure. Trust me, there has been a lot of work on the wiki these past few months despite seeming like nothing is changing. It's almost done. If you want a hint about what it may look like, take a look at the Russian Wiki: https://wiki.warthunder.ru/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 [[User:Kmsxkuse|Kmsxkuse]] ([[User talk:Kmsxkuse|talk]]) 03:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 :::::That's the first time I've seen the RU Wiki, and holy cow... some aspects of that site are really slick. I'd love to see some of those design cues transferred over. [[User:U5724584|MiniMe943]] ([[User talk:U5724584|talk]]) 19:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)