User talk:U48664895 - Revision history

U38088265: /* Hello! */ new section

2023-07-28T22:13:43Z

‎Hello!: new section

U30585107 at 01:56, 10 November 2019

2019-11-10T01:56:36Z

U30585107 at 05:22, 9 November 2019

2019-11-09T05:22:19Z

U30585107 at 02:45, 9 November 2019

2019-11-09T02:45:15Z

U30585107: Created page with "==horsepower graphs== I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers. They are wrong.--~~~~"

2019-11-08T01:17:12Z

Created page with "==horsepower graphs== I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers. They are wrong.--~~~~"

New page

==horsepower graphs==
I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers. They are wrong.--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 01:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 28 July 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:
	::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)		::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
	:::If it does follow the same behavior as jets then it should have a U shaped curve where you get the maximum horsepower at 0 speed. Why it works that way, I don't know.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 01:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)		:::If it does follow the same behavior as jets then it should have a U shaped curve where you get the maximum horsepower at 0 speed. Why it works that way, I don't know.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 01:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Hello! ==
		+
		+	Hello I_Supra_I, I hope this message finds you well. When you have the opportunity, would you be able to [https://forum.warthunder.com/u/DnaGonite send me a PM on the forums]? Many thanks, [[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 22:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 10 November 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::The 1955 might look odd then you'll be even more surprising that the 100% hp of the F-82 is 1600hp from 0 m all the way to 6095m. Feel free to test it.		::The 1955 might look odd then you'll be even more surprising that the 100% hp of the F-82 is 1600hp from 0 m all the way to 6095m. Feel free to test it.
	::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)		::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
		+	:::If it does follow the same behavior as jets then it should have a U shaped curve where you get the maximum horsepower at 0 speed. Why it works that way, I don't know.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 01:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 9 November 2019
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|}		\|}
	:with a straight line connecting the points. So your graph is shaped correctly aside from the beginning values. Judging by my rough eyeballing of of your horsepower values your numbers are a bit off. Could you show me your raw data? Also please do not test in the test flight map many people have claimed it is inaccurate.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 02:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)		:with a straight line connecting the points. So your graph is shaped correctly aside from the beginning values. Judging by my rough eyeballing of of your horsepower values your numbers are a bit off. Could you show me your raw data? Also please do not test in the test flight map many people have claimed it is inaccurate.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 02:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
		+	::The 1955 might look odd then you'll be even more surprising that the 100% hp of the F-82 is 1600hp from 0 m all the way to 6095m. Feel free to test it.
		+	::I'm not sure what would be the best map but I see there is a variance in atmospheric pressure between maps. Perhaps a map with as close to 1 atm at sea level would be optimal? I think some of the deviation from the expected values might also be from the speed of the plane. I tested the plane at ~300km/h and 1000m and got ~1800hp while going at ~640km/h got ~1930hp. I know jets exhibit this behavior but I've never seen it documented for prop planes as well.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 9 November 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==horsepower graphs==		==horsepower graphs==
	I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers. They are wrong.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 01:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)		I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers. They are wrong.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 01:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
		+	:The expected values for the F-82e's WEP horsepower for 1 engine based on the code are
		+	{\| class="wikitable"
		+	\|-
		+	! Alt !! WEP HP
		+	\|-
		+	\| 0 m \|\| 1955
		+	\|-
		+	\| 1000 m\|\| 1955
		+	\|-
		+	\| 6095 m \|\| 1700
		+	\|-
		+	\| 9143 m \|\| 1329
		+	\|}
		+	:with a straight line connecting the points. So your graph is shaped correctly aside from the beginning values. Judging by my rough eyeballing of of your horsepower values your numbers are a bit off. Could you show me your raw data? Also please do not test in the test flight map many people have claimed it is inaccurate.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 02:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)