User talk:U1619975 - Revision history

U42773747: /* Regarding the rooikat edit. */

2020-09-15T17:27:46Z

‎Regarding the rooikat edit.

U1619975: /* Regarding the rooikat edit. */

2020-09-15T17:26:15Z

‎Regarding the rooikat edit.

U1619975: /* Regarding the rooikat edit. */

2020-09-15T17:25:44Z

‎Regarding the rooikat edit.

U1619975: /* Regarding the rooikat edit. */

2020-09-15T17:24:57Z

‎Regarding the rooikat edit.

U42773747: /* Regarding the rooikat edit. */ new section

2020-09-15T14:13:48Z

‎Regarding the rooikat edit.: new section

U44629479: /* Warthunder forum link */ new section

2020-03-05T09:05:02Z

‎Warthunder forum link: new section

U1619975: Clarity on P-51 Family page

2019-11-19T13:29:13Z

Clarity on P-51 Family page

U64962917: .

2019-11-12T00:21:23Z

U64962917: Response @thunderdog1138

2019-11-11T23:19:40Z

Response @thunderdog1138

U90879773: /* P-51 (Family) */ new section

2019-11-11T22:36:12Z

‎P-51 (Family): new section

New page

== P-51 (Family) ==

I noticed that you made an edit to [[P-51 (Family)]] that added hidden sections for future documentation of the Mustang's history. I would not add these to the family article, I would create a history article for this purpose (which, coincidentally, I have already started working on [[User:U90879773#History of the P-51 Mustang|here]]).

Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 15 September 2020
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point. Please try to keep it under 25 words, max.		The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point. Please try to keep it under 25 words, max.
	--[[User:U1619975\|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975\|talk]])		--[[User:U1619975\|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975\|talk]])
		+
		+	:I see, i will try to re-write it to be more on point and generally more useful, then. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 17:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 15 September 2020
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Hello,		Hello,
	The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point. Please try to keep it under 25 words, max.		The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point. Please try to keep it under 25 words, max.
		+	--[[User:U1619975\|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975\|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 15 September 2020
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Hello,		Hello,
−	The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point~~, we need complex information in it~~. ~~please~~ try to keep it under 25 words, max.	+	The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point. Please try to keep it under 25 words, max.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 15 September 2020
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Do you mean "make it more clear" in a sense of re-screenshotting it in higher graphic settings (that can be arranged with a replay screenshot, I guess), or do you mean it as in terms of specifying how it happens? (because point of screenshot was displaying where the shell hit for that to happen, but I could try to rewrite text as well)		Do you mean "make it more clear" in a sense of re-screenshotting it in higher graphic settings (that can be arranged with a replay screenshot, I guess), or do you mean it as in terms of specifying how it happens? (because point of screenshot was displaying where the shell hit for that to happen, but I could try to rewrite text as well)
	--[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 14:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 14:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	Hello,
		+	The screenshot isn't clear on what it is showing, the text needs clarity, most of the text written in text box is redundant. Keep the text in the text box, to the point, we need complex information in it. please try to keep it under 25 words, max.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:13, 15 September 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	(I don't browse the forum often, contacting me on the wiki is the quicker way to reach me).		(I don't browse the forum often, contacting me on the wiki is the quicker way to reach me).
	--[[User:U44629479\|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479\|talk]]) 09:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:U44629479\|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479\|talk]]) 09:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Regarding the rooikat edit. ==
		+
		+	Do you mean "make it more clear" in a sense of re-screenshotting it in higher graphic settings (that can be arranged with a replay screenshot, I guess), or do you mean it as in terms of specifying how it happens? (because point of screenshot was displaying where the shell hit for that to happen, but I could try to rewrite text as well)
		+	--[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 14:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 5 March 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Please do keep up your great work! Kindest Regards --[[User:U1619975\|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975\|talk]]) 13:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)		Please do keep up your great work! Kindest Regards --[[User:U1619975\|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975\|talk]]) 13:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Warthunder forum link ==
		+
		+	As requested, here is my profile on WarThunder forum: https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/profile/653321-colok76286/
		+	(I don't browse the forum often, contacting me on the wiki is the quicker way to reach me).
		+	--[[User:U44629479\|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479\|talk]]) 09:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 19 November 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773\|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773\|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)		Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773\|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773\|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
		+
	:*@thunderdog1138, while it may appear as if patrioticalien is staking a claim to the P-51, I don’t think that is the case. Due to time zones, work, school, life, it may take a day or two for someone to get an idea out on a page and in the meantime don’t want anyone to add/edit/delete until they are finished. We do authorize notice banners to be used on a page if someone is actively editing a page, but those are usually only good for a day or two and then the page is released for anyone to edit after that. It just happens that both of you are working on similar things at the same time; let's give him an opportunity to finish working on this. I do appreciate the work you are doing with your history section of the P-51 family. I am very interested to see how yours fleshes out, however, it may get to a size where it would not be feasible to put it on the P-51 pages or the family page, instead, we may look at giving it its own page much like [[US Bombs General Information]] or [[Japan Bombs General Information]] and from there we can create links on the appropriate pages with the main template (<nowiki>{{main\|P-51 History}}</nowiki> or something like that). You are correct that this is a collaborative effort and there are lots of good ideas going around to make the War Thunder Wiki a very interesting and informative wiki for everyone to use and contribute to. I think it is interesting when doing a Google search, how close to the top of the results often times the WT Wiki pages come up. Keep up the good work, if you should have any questions as you go, please don't hesitate to ask. --[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 23:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)		:*@thunderdog1138, while it may appear as if patrioticalien is staking a claim to the P-51, I don’t think that is the case. Due to time zones, work, school, life, it may take a day or two for someone to get an idea out on a page and in the meantime don’t want anyone to add/edit/delete until they are finished. We do authorize notice banners to be used on a page if someone is actively editing a page, but those are usually only good for a day or two and then the page is released for anyone to edit after that. It just happens that both of you are working on similar things at the same time; let's give him an opportunity to finish working on this. I do appreciate the work you are doing with your history section of the P-51 family. I am very interested to see how yours fleshes out, however, it may get to a size where it would not be feasible to put it on the P-51 pages or the family page, instead, we may look at giving it its own page much like [[US Bombs General Information]] or [[Japan Bombs General Information]] and from there we can create links on the appropriate pages with the main template (<nowiki>{{main\|P-51 History}}</nowiki> or something like that). You are correct that this is a collaborative effort and there are lots of good ideas going around to make the War Thunder Wiki a very interesting and informative wiki for everyone to use and contribute to. I think it is interesting when doing a Google search, how close to the top of the results often times the WT Wiki pages come up. Keep up the good work, if you should have any questions as you go, please don't hesitate to ask. --[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 23:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Hello :*@thunderdog1138, hope your having a fantastic day! These Family pages are very new, they are in very late alpha test right now. A few family pages have been selected, to further this development, into the next phase of development (The P-51 Mustang Family page is one of these that, has been selected). These pages - right now should not be edited, at this time, in-order not to disappoint anyone who may wish to edit them. We have some upcoming plans for them, which we need to test & develop, to get the best possible experience for everyone! These are going to happen soon and possible some radical changes & further ideas for all family pages in general.
		+
		+	Please do keep up your great work! Kindest Regards --[[User:U1619975\|U1619975]] ([[User talk:U1619975\|talk]]) 13:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 12 November 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773\|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773\|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)		Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773\|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773\|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
−	:*@thunderdog1138, while it may appear as if patrioticalien is staking claim to the P-51 ~~(Family) page~~, I ~~don't~~ think that is the ~~deal~~. ~~Since we have migrated from the old wiki~~ to ~~this one over the last year we have had several projects lined up we wanted~~ to ~~implement and have been rolling them~~ out ~~as time has allowed. The Family pages initially were just~~ a ~~collective~~ page ~~which just provided links~~ to ~~different variants of the same vehicle, however, we have thought~~ they ~~could~~ be a ~~little more and hence patrioticalien~~ is ~~creating the first prototype of this~~ page ~~addition. We don't have~~ a ~~"test wiki"~~ or ~~a separate development platform in which to prototype stuff before implementing it, just like everyone else, we have~~ to ~~do all~~ that ~~here too~~. It ~~jus~~ happens that ~~the~~ both of you are working on similar things at the same time, let's give him an opportunity to finish ~~fleshing out this prototype so we can have a~~ working ~~copy we can implement~~ on ~~other family pages~~. I do appreciate the work you are doing with your history section of the P-51 family. I am very interested to see how yours fleshes out, however, it may get to a size where it would not be feasible to put it on the P-51 pages or the family page, instead, we may look at giving it its own page much like [[US Bombs General Information]] or [[Japan Bombs General Information]] and from there we can create links on the appropriate pages with the main template (<nowiki>{{main\|P-51 History}}</nowiki> or something like that). You are correct that this is a collaborative effort and there are lots of good ideas going around to make the War Thunder Wiki a very interesting and informative wiki for everyone to use and contribute to. I think it is interesting when doing a Google search, how close to the top of the results often times the WT Wiki pages come up. Keep up the good work, if you should have any questions as you go, please don't hesitate to ask. --[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 23:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)	+	:*@thunderdog1138, while it may appear as if patrioticalien is staking a claim to the P-51, I don’t think that is the case. Due to time zones, work, school, life, it may take a day or two for someone to get an idea out on a page and in the meantime don’t want anyone to add/edit/delete until they are finished. We do authorize notice banners to be used on a page if someone is actively editing a page, but those are usually only good for a day or two and then the page is released for anyone to edit after that. It just happens that both of you are working on similar things at the same time; let's give him an opportunity to finish working on this. I do appreciate the work you are doing with your history section of the P-51 family. I am very interested to see how yours fleshes out, however, it may get to a size where it would not be feasible to put it on the P-51 pages or the family page, instead, we may look at giving it its own page much like [[US Bombs General Information]] or [[Japan Bombs General Information]] and from there we can create links on the appropriate pages with the main template (<nowiki>{{main\|P-51 History}}</nowiki> or something like that). You are correct that this is a collaborative effort and there are lots of good ideas going around to make the War Thunder Wiki a very interesting and informative wiki for everyone to use and contribute to. I think it is interesting when doing a Google search, how close to the top of the results often times the WT Wiki pages come up. Keep up the good work, if you should have any questions as you go, please don't hesitate to ask. --[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 23:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 11 November 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773\|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773\|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)		Also, your hidden comment "Please do not change this page in anyway" is discouraged on most wikis as it constitutes "ownership of articles", which goes against the spirit of collaboration. I see that there is no article on this wiki that covers this problem, but there is such a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content page on Wikipedia] that I believe applies to all organized collaborative wikis. [[User:U90879773\|U90879773]] ([[User talk:U90879773\|talk]]) 22:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
		+	:*@thunderdog1138, while it may appear as if patrioticalien is staking claim to the P-51 (Family) page, I don't think that is the deal. Since we have migrated from the old wiki to this one over the last year we have had several projects lined up we wanted to implement and have been rolling them out as time has allowed. The Family pages initially were just a collective page which just provided links to different variants of the same vehicle, however, we have thought they could be a little more and hence patrioticalien is creating the first prototype of this page addition. We don't have a "test wiki" or a separate development platform in which to prototype stuff before implementing it, just like everyone else, we have to do all that here too. It jus happens that the both of you are working on similar things at the same time, let's give him an opportunity to finish fleshing out this prototype so we can have a working copy we can implement on other family pages. I do appreciate the work you are doing with your history section of the P-51 family. I am very interested to see how yours fleshes out, however, it may get to a size where it would not be feasible to put it on the P-51 pages or the family page, instead, we may look at giving it its own page much like [[US Bombs General Information]] or [[Japan Bombs General Information]] and from there we can create links on the appropriate pages with the main template (<nowiki>{{main\|P-51 History}}</nowiki> or something like that). You are correct that this is a collaborative effort and there are lots of good ideas going around to make the War Thunder Wiki a very interesting and informative wiki for everyone to use and contribute to. I think it is interesting when doing a Google search, how close to the top of the results often times the WT Wiki pages come up. Keep up the good work, if you should have any questions as you go, please don't hesitate to ask. --[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 23:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)