User talk:U13682523 - Revision history

U38088265: Reverted edits by U163751630 (talk) to last revision by U30821137

2024-01-12T07:55:24Z

Reverted edits by U163751630 (talk) to last revision by U30821137

Can't load revision 180307

U163751630: /* TTX table question */

2024-01-12T07:49:57Z

‎TTX table question

Can't load revision 180306

U30821137: /* Garage Images */ new section

2022-06-19T08:20:51Z

‎Garage Images: new section

U42773747: /* Regarding the optics table */

2019-10-23T20:32:18Z

‎Regarding the optics table

U42773747: /* Regarding the optics table */

2019-10-23T18:14:29Z

‎Regarding the optics table

U13682523: /* Regarding the optics table */ Responses

2019-10-23T17:55:47Z

‎Regarding the optics table: Responses

U42773747: /* Regarding the optics table */

2019-10-23T16:44:57Z

‎Regarding the optics table

U30585107: /* Regarding the optics table */

2019-10-23T12:03:17Z

‎Regarding the optics table

U42773747: /* Regarding the optics table */

2019-10-23T07:09:56Z

‎Regarding the optics table

U30585107: /* Regarding the optics table */

2019-10-23T05:07:24Z

‎Regarding the optics table

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 19 June 2022
Line 159:		Line 159:
	:: I don't know, the ones with .5 can stay as is, i have no idea in whichway it is supposed to be rounded anyway. For rounding i meant all the .49s and all that. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 18:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		:: I don't know, the ones with .5 can stay as is, i have no idea in whichway it is supposed to be rounded anyway. For rounding i meant all the .49s and all that. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 18:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
	::: Rounded most of that for fun. Commented on some things in edit history. You may revert it back to original or to .4-5 even in .0 cases if you feel like it. I don't really mind either way, since it is still more correct than what X-ray says, so whatever, no need to spend more time on this IMO, lol. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 20:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		::: Rounded most of that for fun. Commented on some things in edit history. You may revert it back to original or to .4-5 even in .0 cases if you feel like it. I don't really mind either way, since it is still more correct than what X-ray says, so whatever, no need to spend more time on this IMO, lol. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 20:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Garage Images ==
		+
		+	Hello, i have only low quality graphics, can you add a garageimage for the Z-19E chinese helicopter? Also checking the garageimages category i saw that at the end a few files are not prefixed with GarageImage. should that be changed? --[[User:U30821137\|U30821137]] ([[User talk:U30821137\|talk]]) 08:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 23 October 2019
Line 158:		Line 158:
	: Personally I like seeing stuff rounded to 0.25s and 0.75s at least (although I can see that having most rounded to 1 d.p. and a few .25s and .75s in there might look odd). --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 17:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		: Personally I like seeing stuff rounded to 0.25s and 0.75s at least (although I can see that having most rounded to 1 d.p. and a few .25s and .75s in there might look odd). --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 17:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
	:: I don't know, the ones with .5 can stay as is, i have no idea in whichway it is supposed to be rounded anyway. For rounding i meant all the .49s and all that. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 18:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		:: I don't know, the ones with .5 can stay as is, i have no idea in whichway it is supposed to be rounded anyway. For rounding i meant all the .49s and all that. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 18:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
		+	::: Rounded most of that for fun. Commented on some things in edit history. You may revert it back to original or to .4-5 even in .0 cases if you feel like it. I don't really mind either way, since it is still more correct than what X-ray says, so whatever, no need to spend more time on this IMO, lol. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 20:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 23 October 2019
Line 157:		Line 157:
	Results of tests: Hori VS type60ATM X6-6.2 zoom, compass is different by 1 mm and picture does look slightly closer in type 60 atm (might as well be difference in height, but whatever). Retest with challengers VS chieftain on X7-7.25: In chieftain scope trees and bushes seem closer and again compass seems to be wider (i think it's not affected by lenses themselves so it stays true?), and in this case the tanks are near identical in height. I suppose this confirms that the datamined zooms are actually more correct than X-ray, despite looking weird. I would still round them to 1 decimal just to make it look more clean where applicable. After that and ironing out standard with mods we can just dump it everywhere, i guess. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 16:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		Results of tests: Hori VS type60ATM X6-6.2 zoom, compass is different by 1 mm and picture does look slightly closer in type 60 atm (might as well be difference in height, but whatever). Retest with challengers VS chieftain on X7-7.25: In chieftain scope trees and bushes seem closer and again compass seems to be wider (i think it's not affected by lenses themselves so it stays true?), and in this case the tanks are near identical in height. I suppose this confirms that the datamined zooms are actually more correct than X-ray, despite looking weird. I would still round them to 1 decimal just to make it look more clean where applicable. After that and ironing out standard with mods we can just dump it everywhere, i guess. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 16:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
	: Personally I like seeing stuff rounded to 0.25s and 0.75s at least (although I can see that having most rounded to 1 d.p. and a few .25s and .75s in there might look odd). --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 17:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		: Personally I like seeing stuff rounded to 0.25s and 0.75s at least (although I can see that having most rounded to 1 d.p. and a few .25s and .75s in there might look odd). --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 17:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
		+	:: I don't know, the ones with .5 can stay as is, i have no idea in whichway it is supposed to be rounded anyway. For rounding i meant all the .49s and all that. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 18:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 153: / Line 153: @@
 :Truncation is cutting off everything to the right without concern, correct? It would contradict X-rays a lot in cases of .49 and such. I will attempt to test various ~6.0 and ~6.2 zooms in the evening to see if they really are different in any way (unfortunately no 4k screen so i might have to resort to pixel-perfect compass comparsion or something). If they are different, then it's just rounding to 1 decimal and taking them all as legit, if not then it's complicated, because Stormer HVM and many ATGM tanks calculated stats are off by 0.7 from X-ray and what i consider real. --[[User:U42773747|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747|talk]]) 07:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 ::Yeah. I was getting a bit hung up on the .05's that were getting rounded down. It might just be because the numbers are already being rounded to 2 decimal places. Flame can you rerun the exact numbers and round to 1 decimal place?--[[User:U30585107|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107|talk]]) 12:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 Results of tests: Hori VS type60ATM X6-6.2 zoom, compass is different by 1 mm and picture does look slightly closer in type 60 atm (might as well be difference in height, but whatever). Retest with challengers VS chieftain on X7-7.25: In chieftain scope trees and bushes seem closer and again compass seems to be wider (i think it's not affected by lenses themselves so it stays true?), and in this case the tanks are near identical in height. I suppose this confirms that the datamined zooms are actually more correct than X-ray, despite looking weird. I would still round them to 1 decimal just to make it look more clean where applicable. After that and ironing out standard with mods we can just dump it everywhere, i guess. --[[User:U42773747|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747|talk]]) 16:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 23 October 2019
Line 153:		Line 153:
	:Truncation is cutting off everything to the right without concern, correct? It would contradict X-rays a lot in cases of .49 and such. I will attempt to test various ~6.0 and ~6.2 zooms in the evening to see if they really are different in any way (unfortunately no 4k screen so i might have to resort to pixel-perfect compass comparsion or something). If they are different, then it's just rounding to 1 decimal and taking them all as legit, if not then it's complicated, because Stormer HVM and many ATGM tanks calculated stats are off by 0.7 from X-ray and what i consider real. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 07:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		:Truncation is cutting off everything to the right without concern, correct? It would contradict X-rays a lot in cases of .49 and such. I will attempt to test various ~6.0 and ~6.2 zooms in the evening to see if they really are different in any way (unfortunately no 4k screen so i might have to resort to pixel-perfect compass comparsion or something). If they are different, then it's just rounding to 1 decimal and taking them all as legit, if not then it's complicated, because Stormer HVM and many ATGM tanks calculated stats are off by 0.7 from X-ray and what i consider real. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 07:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
	::Yeah. I was getting a bit hung up on the .05's that were getting rounded down. It might just be because the numbers are already being rounded to 2 decimal places. Flame can you rerun the exact numbers and round to 1 decimal place?--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 12:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		::Yeah. I was getting a bit hung up on the .05's that were getting rounded down. It might just be because the numbers are already being rounded to 2 decimal places. Flame can you rerun the exact numbers and round to 1 decimal place?--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 12:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Results of tests: Hori VS type60ATM X6-6.2 zoom, compass is different by 1 mm and picture does look slightly closer in type 60 atm (might as well be difference in height, but whatever). Retest with challengers VS chieftain on X7-7.25: In chieftain scope trees and bushes seem closer and again compass seems to be wider (i think it's not affected by lenses themselves so it stays true?), and in this case the tanks are near identical in height. I suppose this confirms that the datamined zooms are actually more correct than X-ray, despite looking weird. I would still round them to 1 decimal just to make it look more clean where applicable. After that and ironing out standard with mods we can just dump it everywhere, i guess. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 16:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 23 October 2019
Line 152:		Line 152:

	:Truncation is cutting off everything to the right without concern, correct? It would contradict X-rays a lot in cases of .49 and such. I will attempt to test various ~6.0 and ~6.2 zooms in the evening to see if they really are different in any way (unfortunately no 4k screen so i might have to resort to pixel-perfect compass comparsion or something). If they are different, then it's just rounding to 1 decimal and taking them all as legit, if not then it's complicated, because Stormer HVM and many ATGM tanks calculated stats are off by 0.7 from X-ray and what i consider real. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 07:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		:Truncation is cutting off everything to the right without concern, correct? It would contradict X-rays a lot in cases of .49 and such. I will attempt to test various ~6.0 and ~6.2 zooms in the evening to see if they really are different in any way (unfortunately no 4k screen so i might have to resort to pixel-perfect compass comparsion or something). If they are different, then it's just rounding to 1 decimal and taking them all as legit, if not then it's complicated, because Stormer HVM and many ATGM tanks calculated stats are off by 0.7 from X-ray and what i consider real. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 07:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
		+	::Yeah. I was getting a bit hung up on the .05's that were getting rounded down. It might just be because the numbers are already being rounded to 2 decimal places. Flame can you rerun the exact numbers and round to 1 decimal place?--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 12:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:09, 23 October 2019
Line 150:		Line 150:

	Seems to me like the zoom is a simple truncation to 1 decimal place.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)		Seems to me like the zoom is a simple truncation to 1 decimal place.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Truncation is cutting off everything to the right without concern, correct? It would contradict X-rays a lot in cases of .49 and such. I will attempt to test various ~6.0 and ~6.2 zooms in the evening to see if they really are different in any way (unfortunately no 4k screen so i might have to resort to pixel-perfect compass comparsion or something). If they are different, then it's just rounding to 1 decimal and taking them all as legit, if not then it's complicated, because Stormer HVM and many ATGM tanks calculated stats are off by 0.7 from X-ray and what i consider real. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 07:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 23 October 2019
Line 148:		Line 148:

	:::I think the only uneven magnification on X-ray i saw was 5.6 on BMP-2 and 16.01 or something on otomatic. Well, i'll see how it goes. I dunno, if we could also compare them by BR and class at the same time it would be fire (to see what faction has upper hand and in what), but since BR changes a lot we can only realistically use rank, which is a bit too broad in my opinion. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 22:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)		:::I think the only uneven magnification on X-ray i saw was 5.6 on BMP-2 and 16.01 or something on otomatic. Well, i'll see how it goes. I dunno, if we could also compare them by BR and class at the same time it would be fire (to see what faction has upper hand and in what), but since BR changes a lot we can only realistically use rank, which is a bit too broad in my opinion. --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 22:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Seems to me like the zoom is a simple truncation to 1 decimal place.--[[User:U30585107\|U30585107]] ([[User talk:U30585107\|talk]]) 05:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)