User:U3032832 - Revision history

U3032832 at 03:40, 31 October 2019

2019-10-31T03:40:19Z

U3032832: added ShVAK ammunition tables

2019-10-31T02:01:26Z

added ShVAK ammunition tables

U3032832: revised ammunition tables

2019-10-31T00:55:03Z

revised ammunition tables

U3032832: testing M2 Browning MG tables

2019-10-30T22:37:03Z

testing M2 Browning MG tables

U3032832: added in empty tables for reference

2019-10-30T20:04:21Z

added in empty tables for reference

U3032832: spelling, updated rework section

2019-10-05T18:48:41Z

spelling, updated rework section

U3032832: added proper title, added new section

2019-09-08T16:18:21Z

added proper title, added new section

U3032832: Page creation

2019-09-05T20:51:52Z

Page creation

New page

Greetings, and this is the user page of godzilla5549. I have been playing War Thunder off and on since 2013.

I primarily pay Realistic Battles in Ground and Air as well as Arcade Naval Battles. Recently, my focus has been on Naval due to my interests. I typically play American and German trees, although I have some progress in the Soviet tech tree as well.

I am a student of history and have a large interest in 20th century warfare, primarily naval warfare. While I am new to the War Thunder Wiki, I am not new to creating historical and factual write-ups of warships.

@@ Line 179: / Line 179: @@
 | colspan="1" | HEF || 91 || 5.8 || 800 || No || 2 || 2 || 1.5 || 1 || 0.5 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | FI || 96 || 8.62 || No || 2 || 2 || 1.5 || 0.5 || 0
+| colspan="1" | FI || 96 || 8.62 || 800 || No || 2 || 2 || 1.5 || 1 || 0.5 || 0
 |}

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 === Table Testing Area ===
-{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
+{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center" width="100%"
 |-
 ! colspan="14" | Browning M2 (Early) Ammunition
 |-
-! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Ammunition
+! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Name
 ! rowspan="2" | Type
 ! rowspan="2" | Mass (grams)
@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 |}
-{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
+{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center" width="100%"
 |-
 ! colspan="14" | Browning M2 Ammunition
 |-
-! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Ammunition
+! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Name
 ! rowspan="2" | Type
 ! rowspan="2" | Mass (grams)
@@ Line 121: / Line 121: @@
 |}
-{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
+{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center" width="100%
 |-
 ! colspan="14" | Browning M2 (Late) Ammunition
 |-
-! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Ammunition
+! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Name
 ! rowspan="2" | Type
 ! rowspan="2" | Mass (grams)
@@ Line 152: / Line 152: @@
 |-
 | colspan="1" | M23 || I || 35 || ''N/A'' || 1040 || No || 2 || 2 || 2 || 2 || 0.1 || 0
 |}

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
 |-
-! colspan="12" | Browning M2 (Early)
+! colspan="14" | Browning M2 (Early) Ammunition
 |-
-! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Shell
+! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Ammunition
 ! rowspan="2" | Mass (grams)
-! rowspan="2" | Explosive Mass (grams)
+! rowspan="2" | Explosive Mass (TNT Equivalent) (grams)
 ! rowspan="2" | Muzzle Velocity <br> (meters/second)
 ! rowspan="2" | Tracer
@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 |-
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M1 Tracer || 43.8 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 823 || Yes || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M1 || Tracer || 43.8 || ''N/A'' || 823 || Yes || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M2 Ball (Omni-purpose) || 45.2 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 867 || No || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M2 || Ball (Omni-purpose) || 45.2 || ''N/A'' || 867 || No || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M1 I || 41 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A || 944 || No || 5 || 4 || 4 || 3 || 1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M1 || I|| 41 || ''N/A'' || 944 || No || 5 || 4 || 4 || 3 || 1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M2 AP || 46 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M2 || AP || 46 || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
 |}
 {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
 |-
-! colspan="12" | Browning M2
+! colspan="14" | Browning M2 Ammunition
 |-
-! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Shell
+! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Ammunition
 ! rowspan="2" | Mass (grams)
-! rowspan="2" | Explosive Mass (grams)
+! rowspan="2" | Explosive Mass (TNT Equivalent) (grams)
 ! rowspan="2" | Muzzle Velocity <br> (meters/second)
 ! rowspan="2" | Tracer
@@ Line 110: / Line 110: @@
 |-
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M1 Tracer || 43.8 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 832 || Yes || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M1 || Tracer || 43.8 || ''N/A'' || 832 || Yes || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M2 Ball (Omni-purpose) || 45.2 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 867 || No || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M2 || Ball (Omni-purpose) || 45.2 || ''N/A'' || 867 || No || 10 || 8 || 7 || 6 || 0.1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M1 I || 41 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A || 944 || No || 5 || 4 || 4 || 3 || 1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M1 || I || 41 || ''N/A'' || 944 || No || 5 || 4 || 4 || 3 || 1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M2 AP || 46 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M2 || AP || 46 || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M8 AP-I || 40.3 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A || 887 || No || 23 || 22 || 16 || 10 || 1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M8 || AP-I || 40.3 || ''N/A'' || 887 || No || 23 || 22 || 16 || 10 || 1 || 0
 |}
 {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
 |-
-! colspan="12" | Browning M2 (Late)
+! colspan="14" | Browning M2 (Late) Ammunition
 |-
-! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Shell
+! rowspan="2" width="5em"| Ammunition
 ! rowspan="2" | Mass (grams)
-! rowspan="2" | Explosive Mass (grams)
+! rowspan="2" | Explosive Mass (TNT Equivalent) (grams)
 ! rowspan="2" | Muzzle Velocity <br> (meters/second)
 ! rowspan="2" | Tracer
@@ Line 141: / Line 141: @@
 |-
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M20 API-T || 40.3 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 899 || Yes || 23 || 22 || 16 || 10 || 5 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M20 || API-T || 40.3 || ''N/A'' || 899 || Yes || 23 || 22 || 16 || 10 || 5 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M2 Ball (Omni-purpose) || 46 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M2 || Ball (Omni-purpose) || 46 || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M1 I || 41 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A || 944 || No || 5 || 4 || 4 || 3 || 1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M1 || I || 41 || ''N/A'' || 944 || No || 5 || 4 || 4 || 3 || 1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M2 AP || 46 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M2 || AP || 46 || ''N/A'' || 865 || No || 26 || 25 || 19 || 12 || 6 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M8 AP-I || 40.3 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 887 || No || 23 || 22 || 16 || 10 || 1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M8 || AP-I || 40.3 || ''N/A'' || 887 || No || 23 || 22 || 16 || 10 || 1 || 0
 |-
-| colspan="1" | M23 I || 35 || ''N/A'' || ''N/A'' || 1040 || No || 2 || 2 || 2 || 2 || 0.1 || 0
+| colspan="1" | M23 || I || 35 || ''N/A'' || 1040 || No || 2 || 2 || 2 || 2 || 0.1 || 0
 |}

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 |-
 | colspan="1" | X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X
 |}

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 This page will mainly serve as a collection for things that I like to have on hand.
-==Naval Forces Progression Rework==
+== Repository of Tables ==
 This is an idea that I have come up with as a way to rework the progression in naval so as to alleviate balance issues and allow for correction of some battle ratings. While ground and air forces currently have a purely vertical progression system (progress down each line, with different lines for different vehicle roles), naval forces has a combined vertical ''and'' horizontal aspect to it. You must traverse the tech tree to unlock the sufficient number of vehicles to move down the tech tree.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Greetings, and this is the user page of godzilla5549. I have been playing War Thunder off and on since 2013.
-I primarily pay Realistic Battles in Ground and Air as well as Arcade Naval Battles. Recently, my focus has been on Naval due to my interests. I typically play American and German trees, although I have some progress in the Soviet tech tree as well.
+I primarily play Realistic Battles in Ground and Air as well as Arcade Naval Battles. Recently, my focus has been on Naval due to my interests. I typically play American and German trees, although I have some progress in the Soviet tech tree as well.
 I am a student of history and have a large interest in 20th century warfare, primarily naval warfare. While I am new to the War Thunder Wiki, I am not new to creating historical and factual write-ups of warships.
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 So instead of having this continue, I have decided to come up with a way to reorganize the progression of naval forces tech trees that would more closely resemble the progression model of ground and air forces. This will be a continual work in progress that will take some time, but I will hopefully keep it updated and will likely add on theoretical extensions of the tech tress with additional ships fitted in.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 8 September 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{DISPLAYTITLE:godzilla5549}}
		+
	Greetings, and this is the user page of godzilla5549. I have been playing War Thunder off and on since 2013.		Greetings, and this is the user page of godzilla5549. I have been playing War Thunder off and on since 2013.

Line 4:		Line 6:

	I am a student of history and have a large interest in 20th century warfare, primarily naval warfare. While I am new to the War Thunder Wiki, I am not new to creating historical and factual write-ups of warships.		I am a student of history and have a large interest in 20th century warfare, primarily naval warfare. While I am new to the War Thunder Wiki, I am not new to creating historical and factual write-ups of warships.
		+
		+	This page will mainly serve as a collection for things that I like to have on hand.
		+
		+	==Naval Forces Progression Rework==
		+
		+	This is an idea that I have come up with as a way to rework the progression in naval so as to alleviate balance issues and allow for correction of some battle ratings. While ground and air forces currently have a purely vertical progression system (progress down each line, with different lines for different vehicle roles), naval forces has a combined vertical ''and'' horizontal aspect to it. You must traverse the tech tree to unlock the sufficient number of vehicles to move down the tech tree.
		+
		+	Through this, you begin with horribly weak torpedo boats with a handful of machine guns but soon unlock torpedo boats that are much more armed. After, you can unlock motor gun boats that give up their torpedoes but have much more firepower. Then you move on to unlock submarine chasers and minesweepers, beginning with some of the weaker examples but eventually unlocking much more powerful ones with multiple auto-cannons and even heavy artillery (3" guns, automatic 6-pdr guns). These often lead in to large corvettes or frigates which dwarf the small torpedo boats they can face, but are armed with an array of guns to wipe the seas clean. You then move to research the finest examples of motor boats there are, some with very high powered torpedoes, others that are bristling with guns, some that have heavy armor and even a few with modern automatic cannons.
		+
		+	And then you unlock the first destroyer. And this whole cycle repeats again, with terribly weak destroyers giving way to far better examples. But then it all repeats again after unlocking the first light cruiser, which is also a weak ship in comparison to other cruisers. All the while, the battle ratings are compressed so as to keep a large portion of these ships fighting each other with massive gaps in relative power.
		+
		+	So instead of having this continue, I have decided to come up with a way to reorganize the progression of naval forces tech trees that would more closely resemble the progression model of ground and air forces. This will be a continual work in progress that will take some time, but I will hopefully keep it updated and will likely add on theoretical extensions of the tech tress with additional ships fitted in.