Talk:Tiger II (H) - Revision history

U44629479: Edits

2021-10-03T08:10:36Z

Edits

U30344518: /* Arcade 7.0, discovered 10-03-2021 */ new section

2021-10-03T00:14:03Z

‎Arcade 7.0, discovered 10-03-2021: new section

U28580205: Response

2020-03-28T18:22:10Z

Response

U46759123: Question: Delete or reform “In-game description” paragraph?

2020-03-28T16:58:47Z

Question: Delete or reform “In-game description” paragraph?

New page

== History ==
=== In-game description ===
The text should be incorrect by now, because the ''“in-game description”'' does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts.
Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The text should be incorrect by now, because the ''“in-game description”'' does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts.
 Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
-: Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary.--[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
+: Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary. --[[User:U28580205|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
-== Arcade 7.0, discovered 10-03-2021  ==
+== BR 7.0 Arcade ==
-So today I discovered that Tiger II H is at 7.0 in Arcade, but 6.7 in RB and SB, how in the world does that make sense? Why use Tiger II H, when I can use Tiger II 10.5 instead? (Yes I managed to get it back then). I hope its a bug, otherwise its a bit stupid decision from Gaijins side, Tiger II H has already problems at pen tanks at 6.7, but 7.0 is bit nerfing. As said, hope its a mistake.
+So today I discovered that the Tiger II (H) is at 7.0 in Arcade, but 6.7 in RB and SB, how in the world does that make sense? Why use the Tiger II (H), when I can use the Tiger II (10.5 cm Kw.K) instead? (yes, I managed to get it back then). I hope it's a bug, otherwise it's a bit stupid decision on Gaijin's side, the Tiger II (H) has already problems at penetrating tanks at 6.7, but 7.0 is bit of a nerf. As I said, I hope it's a mistake.--[[User:U30344518|U30344518]] ([[User talk:U30344518|talk]]) 00:14, 03 October 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 3 October 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123\|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123\|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)		Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123\|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123\|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
	: Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary.--[[User:U28580205\|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205\|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)		: Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary.--[[User:U28580205\|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205\|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Arcade 7.0, discovered 10-03-2021 ==
		+
		+	So today I discovered that Tiger II H is at 7.0 in Arcade, but 6.7 in RB and SB, how in the world does that make sense? Why use Tiger II H, when I can use Tiger II 10.5 instead? (Yes I managed to get it back then). I hope its a bug, otherwise its a bit stupid decision from Gaijins side, Tiger II H has already problems at pen tanks at 6.7, but 7.0 is bit nerfing. As said, hope its a mistake.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 28 March 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The text should be incorrect by now, because the ''“in-game description”'' does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts.		The text should be incorrect by now, because the ''“in-game description”'' does not exist anymore and it is historically wrong in some parts.
	Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123\|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123\|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)		Can it be deleted or reformed? --[[User:U46759123\|U46759123]] ([[User talk:U46759123\|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
		+	: Hello. We are keeping it as an archive of the content that use to be part of the game; so it is not to be edited or deleted. The team can certainly look into its relevancy, however, to see if its future inclusion is necessary.--[[User:U28580205\|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205\|talk]]) 18:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)