Talk:Spitfire Mk IIb - Revision history

U64962917: Response.

2019-10-20T16:25:25Z

Response.

U38088265: Response

2019-10-20T15:20:44Z

Response

U77215690: /* Content? */

2019-10-20T11:27:49Z

‎Content?

U77215690: /* Content? */ new section

2019-10-20T09:43:12Z

‎Content?: new section

New page

== Content? ==

Yo, is the content on the article rn alright? what about format? Did I do anything wrong in a big way?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 20 October 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Mantis		Mantis
	: Looks great to me, keep it up! -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 15:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)		: Looks great to me, keep it up! -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 15:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
		+	::* We have been editing as we approve, sometimes it works best to wait until the article is closer to finishing to make any other formatting changes, not point in making big changes if there is still more info to add. One thing we have to watch for is the page getting too large (there is such thing as too much info on a page which turns people off), so if it gets to that point we may have to look at a <nowiki>{{main\|Spitfire}}</nowiki> page and transfer some of the more common information and leave the individual vehicle page to highlight specifics to that aircraft, kind of like the [https://wiki.warthunder.com/F-84_(Family) F-84] aircraft, relatively the same between all variations, so only minor changes needed to be made between them, however, if we want to add more to the history and such, then we may need to go with a ''main'' page so the individual pages don't get too bloated. The key to these pages is to capture the interest of the player, get them excited to play the vehicle featured (or dream about it if they are not that far in the tech-tree) and help them learn something about playing the vehicle so they may not make as many noob mistakes when they first get it. --[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 16:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 20 October 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Mantis		Mantis
		+	: Looks great to me, keep it up! -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 15:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 20 October 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Yo, is the content on the article rn alright? what about format? Did I do anything wrong in a big way?		Yo, is the content on the article rn alright? what about format? Did I do anything wrong in a big way?
		+
		+	Sincerely,
		+
		+	Mantis