Talk:Night Vision Devices - Revision history

U44629479 at 09:13, 9 November 2022

2022-11-09T09:13:53Z

U44629479: Formatting

2022-11-09T09:11:04Z

Formatting

U6133915: /* Generations of thermals */ new section

2022-11-09T08:50:09Z

‎Generations of thermals: new section

U42773747 at 10:22, 3 October 2019

2019-10-03T10:22:20Z

U42773747: /* Table example and placement */ new section

2019-10-03T10:22:04Z

‎Table example and placement: new section

U64962917: Edits.

2019-09-26T18:39:02Z

Edits.

U38088265: Response

2019-09-26T18:25:01Z

Response

U64962917: Edits.

2019-09-26T18:12:41Z

Edits.

U13682523: /* Table of vehicles */ new section

2019-09-26T18:08:50Z

‎Table of vehicles: new section

New page

== Table of vehicles ==

Can we pick a preferred format and standardise the vehicle table a bit? It looks a odd having five different variations of ticks and crosses. --[[User:U13682523|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523|talk]]) 18:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 9 November 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:

	It would be nice to add the generation of thermal imagers to the table. Right now, it's just Yes/No but the difference between Gen 1 and Gen 3 is quite significant. --[[User:U6133915\|U6133915]] ([[User talk:U6133915\|talk]]) 08:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)		It would be nice to add the generation of thermal imagers to the table. Right now, it's just Yes/No but the difference between Gen 1 and Gen 3 is quite significant. --[[User:U6133915\|U6133915]] ([[User talk:U6133915\|talk]]) 08:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	:We would gladly add it but this information is not available in the game interface. --[[User:U44629479\|U44629479]] ([[User talk:U44629479\|talk]]) 09:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 9 November 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Generations of thermals ==		== Generations of thermals ==

−	~~Would~~ be nice to add ~~generations~~ of thermal imagers ~~into~~ table. Right ~~its~~ just Yes/No but difference between Gen 1 and Gen 3 is quite significant.	+	It would be nice to add the generation of thermal imagers to the table. Right now, it's just Yes/No but the difference between Gen 1 and Gen 3 is quite significant. --[[User:U6133915\|U6133915]] ([[User talk:U6133915\|talk]]) 08:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 9 November 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Also, if the NVD list is 100% correct I can go ahead and bomb all the vehicle pages with the expanded table, correct? --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 10:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)		Also, if the NVD list is 100% correct I can go ahead and bomb all the vehicle pages with the expanded table, correct? --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 10:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Generations of thermals ==
		+
		+	Would be nice to add generations of thermal imagers into table. Right its just Yes/No but difference between Gen 1 and Gen 3 is quite significant.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 3 October 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	It would be nice if NVD table examples were doubled here as well. I can add IR flashlight table to Optics as well, as it hurts nobody, but it still would make more sense to be here (at least so that if person is not interested in reading one page or another, they do not miss it).		It would be nice if NVD table examples were doubled here as well. I can add IR flashlight table to Optics as well, as it hurts nobody, but it still would make more sense to be here (at least so that if person is not interested in reading one page or another, they do not miss it).

−	Also, if the NVD list is 100% correct I can go ahead and bomb all the vehicle pages with the expanded table, correct?	+	Also, if the NVD list is 100% correct I can go ahead and bomb all the vehicle pages with the expanded table, correct? --[[User:U42773747\|U42773747]] ([[User talk:U42773747\|talk]]) 10:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 3 October 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::* I'll go ahead and alphabetise it (as best I can) once you guys have decided on a theme, since I don't really want to have to try and move the styles over to the new version -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 18:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		::* I'll go ahead and alphabetise it (as best I can) once you guys have decided on a theme, since I don't really want to have to try and move the styles over to the new version -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 18:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
	:::* Sounds good!! -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		:::* Sounds good!! -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Table example and placement ==
		+
		+	It would be nice if NVD table examples were doubled here as well. I can add IR flashlight table to Optics as well, as it hurts nobody, but it still would make more sense to be here (at least so that if person is not interested in reading one page or another, they do not miss it).
		+
		+	Also, if the NVD list is 100% correct I can go ahead and bomb all the vehicle pages with the expanded table, correct?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 26 September 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:* It is currently a WIP, a few of us were looking at different options of what might work best, we should have a finalized format later today or tomorrow. I am thinking the Ground Vehicle table needs to be alphabetized or else it looks goofy to have all the flags in order, just my thought. -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		:* It is currently a WIP, a few of us were looking at different options of what might work best, we should have a finalized format later today or tomorrow. I am thinking the Ground Vehicle table needs to be alphabetized or else it looks goofy to have all the flags in order, just my thought. -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
	::* I'll go ahead and alphabetise it (as best I can) once you guys have decided on a theme, since I don't really want to have to try and move the styles over to the new version -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 18:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		::* I'll go ahead and alphabetise it (as best I can) once you guys have decided on a theme, since I don't really want to have to try and move the styles over to the new version -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 18:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
		+	:::* Sounds good!! -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 26 September 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Can we pick a preferred format and standardise the vehicle table a bit? It looks a odd having five different variations of ticks and crosses. --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 18:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		Can we pick a preferred format and standardise the vehicle table a bit? It looks a odd having five different variations of ticks and crosses. --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 18:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
	:* It is currently a WIP, a few of us were looking at different options of what might work best, we should have a finalized format later today or tomorrow. I am thinking the Ground Vehicle table needs to be alphabetized or else it looks goofy to have all the flags in order, just my thought. -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		:* It is currently a WIP, a few of us were looking at different options of what might work best, we should have a finalized format later today or tomorrow. I am thinking the Ground Vehicle table needs to be alphabetized or else it looks goofy to have all the flags in order, just my thought. -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
		+	::* I'll go ahead and alphabetise it (as best I can) once you guys have decided on a theme, since I don't really want to have to try and move the styles over to the new version -[[User:U38088265\|U38088265]] ([[User talk:U38088265\|talk]]) 18:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 26 September 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Can we pick a preferred format and standardise the vehicle table a bit? It looks a odd having five different variations of ticks and crosses. --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 18:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)		Can we pick a preferred format and standardise the vehicle table a bit? It looks a odd having five different variations of ticks and crosses. --[[User:U13682523\|U13682523]] ([[User talk:U13682523\|talk]]) 18:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
		+	:* It is currently a WIP, a few of us were looking at different options of what might work best, we should have a finalized format later today or tomorrow. I am thinking the Ground Vehicle table needs to be alphabetized or else it looks goofy to have all the flags in order, just my thought. -[[User:U64962917\|U64962917]] ([[User talk:U64962917\|talk]]) 18:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)