U28580205: Added comment signature; Added a response.

2021-02-19T23:26:02Z

Added comment signature; Added a response.

U58644986: Leopard 2A5 and 2A6 UFP armor listed as "extremely good" in current patch.

2021-02-19T17:45:49Z

Leopard 2A5 and 2A6 UFP armor listed as "extremely good" in current patch.

New page

As of 19.2.2021, Leopard 2A5 and 2A6 wiki pages state in Pros section that "Extremely good armour on the UFP (430 mm against long rod APFSDS), immune to every shell in the game except DM33, M829, L26, OFL 120 G1, 3BM42 and CL3143"

I think that should be changed to something in lines of

"Armor on the UFP effective against older long rod APFSDS and ATGMS"

Reason is that many nations now posses shells (12 shells in total, with addition of M829A1, 3BM42M, L27A1, DTW-125) with enough penetration to go straight through UFP, over several vechiles. And addition of vechiles such as Canadian ADATS making chemical protection lacking as well. Armor is really effective only against first gen long rods of T-72As, T-64As and other vechiles of similiar BR and era.

Stating that UFP is "Extremely good" IMO can be misleading as to what is sufficient amout of protection at this rank.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 19 February 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Reason is that many nations now posses shells (12 shells in total, with addition of M829A1, 3BM42M, L27A1, DTW-125) with enough penetration to go straight through UFP, over several vechiles. And addition of vechiles such as Canadian ADATS making chemical protection lacking as well. Armor is really effective only against first gen long rods of T-72As, T-64As and other vechiles of similiar BR and era.		Reason is that many nations now posses shells (12 shells in total, with addition of M829A1, 3BM42M, L27A1, DTW-125) with enough penetration to go straight through UFP, over several vechiles. And addition of vechiles such as Canadian ADATS making chemical protection lacking as well. Armor is really effective only against first gen long rods of T-72As, T-64As and other vechiles of similiar BR and era.

−	Stating that UFP is "Extremely good" IMO can be misleading as to what is sufficient amout of protection at this rank.	+	Stating that UFP is "Extremely good" IMO can be misleading as to what is sufficient amout of protection at this rank. --[[User:U58644986\|U58644986]] ([[User talk:U58644986\|talk]]) 17:45, 19 February 2021‎ (UTC)
		+	: Hello [[User:U58644986\|U58644986]]. Due to the Wiki's nature, any players signed in as you are right now can edit the pages to make their own suggested changes to the page content. You are free to edit the content yourself for the moderators to evaluate for publication, so that you do not need to rely on another user to perform the edits. Please look into this [[Help:Creating_articles#Article_writing_and_editing\|section in our help guide]] if you are unfamiliar with editing the Wiki pages. Hope this helps! --[[User:U28580205\|U28580205]] ([[User talk:U28580205\|talk]]) 23:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Leopard 2A6 - Revision history

U28580205: Added comment signature; Added a response.

U58644986: Leopard 2A5 and 2A6 UFP armor listed as "extremely good" in current patch.